Bayman v. Clearwater Power Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, C.J.
This appeal is from an order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants, Tippett and Clearwater Power Co. (hereafter Clearwater). We affirm the summary judgment in favor of Clearwater, but reverse the summary judgment in favor of the Tippetts, remanding the case to Superior Court for trial.
Plaintiff, Larry Bayman, was a contractor employed by the Tippetts to do certain repair work on the Tippett ranch buildings which were located in a rugged canyon area. To save time in supervision of his workmen, Mr. Bayman received permission from Mr. Tippett to be flown to the job site in a private…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- LaPlante v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Balise v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Maltman v. SauerWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Preston v. DuncanWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- McQuillan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fegler Ex Rel. Fegler v. BrodieWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Florida Power and Light Co. v. LivelyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Peterson v. Pacific First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- Shute v. Moon Lake Electric Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Chris William Shute Mid-Valley Helicopters, Inc., an Oregon Corporation v. Moon Lake Electric Association, Inc., a Utah Corporation, Defendant/third-Party-Plaintiff, and Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph, D/B/A Mountain Bell, a Colorado Corporation, Defendant/third-Party-Plaintiff/appellant v. United States of America, Third-Party-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.