Legal Opinion

In re Jan W. Paris, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 26, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAFFEY, District Judge.

I regret the delay in disposing of this matter since the briefs’came in. There has not been earlier opportunity, however, to go over the papers. Even now time is not available to discuss -the numerous law questions argued or fully to recite the evidence in the quite voluminous record. I shall, therefore, deal with a few points only which seem to me to go to the heart of the case.

Nothing is involved except payments by the bankrupt (hereinafter called the corporation) in 1932 to the respondent for legal services.

There are two items. One is $725 and the other is $3,375.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mammoth Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Conrad, Rubin & Lesser v. PenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. United States v. MarescaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
  4. Matters v. Manufacturers' Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  5. In Re M. & M. Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Louis Hookerman, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1943
  2. In re Jan W. Paris, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API