Legal Opinion

Cross v. Pelican Bay State Prison

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 24, 1999No. 98-8486PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Pro se petitioner Cross seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis under Rule 39 of this Court. We deny these requests as frivolous pursuant to Rule 39.8. Cross is allowed until June 14,1999, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38 and to submit his petitions in compliance with this Court’s Rule 33.1. We also direct the Clerk not to accept any further petitions for certiorari from Cross in noncriminal matters unless he first pays the docketing fee required by Rule 38 and submits his petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1.

Cross has repeatedly abused this Court’s certiorari…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cross v. Pelican Bay State PrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Fertel-Rust v. Milwaukee County Mental Health CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Fertel-Rust v. Milwaukee County Mental Health CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. In Re FalangaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  5. Whitfield v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API