Greiner v. Wilke
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants appeal the district court’s af-firmance of the judgment entered by the bankruptcy court. We affirm.
FACTS
The factual circumstances of this appeal are nearly the same as an earlier case, In re Staff Mortgage & Investment Corp., 550 F.2d 1228 (9th Cir. 1977) (Huffman v. Wi-kle ), involving the same bankrupt. Therefore, the facts will not be set forth in detail.
As a part of its business activity, the bankrupt, Staff Mortgage & Investment Corporation (Staff), would borrow money and execute its note to evidence the loan. To secure its loan, Staff would…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Domarad v. Fisher & Burke, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Staff Mortgage and Investment Corporation v. WikleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Rucker v. State Exchange BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Nikolas v. WitterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Port of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Staff Mortgage & Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Maloney v. Stewart Title & Trust of Tucson (In Re Nichols)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 1988
- Peoples Bank of Polk County v. McDonald (In Re Maryville Savings & Loan Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1983
- In Re Staff Mortgage & Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Baida v. WikleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981