Legal Opinion

City of Eskridge v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1893PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from, Wabaunsee District Oowrt. Action by Betty Lewis against the City, to recover damages for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. The defendant comes here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

This was an action for personal injuries resulting from a defective sidewalk, in which Betty Lewis recovered from the city of Eskridge a judgment for $600. The city asked for a new trial, and based its motion on numerous rulings said to be erroneous, which were made in the course of the trial, but the motion was denied. The defendant in error challenges our right to review these rulings, for the reason that the motion for a new trial was not made within the time prescribed by the code. We find that the record fails to show affirmatively…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. PointerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  2. Nesbit v. HinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. City of Wyandotte v. AganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Elling v. Blake-McFall Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Hoff v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Julius Winkelmeyer Brewing Ass'n v. WolffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  4. Lewis v. City of EskridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  5. Masters v. WinfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API