Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Morgan

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 1951No. Civ. 17946PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, J. pro tem.

In this action by the city of Los Angeles to condemn a parcel of land, originally subdivided into 39 residential lots, the trial court ruled that respondent, Los Angeles Rock and Gravel Company, a limited partnership, was the absolute owner of the property, and hence entitled to the condemnation award, and that appellant Catherine A. McKenna had no right, title or interest in the property.

The trial court found that the respondent had a perfect title of record deraigned from its predecessor corporations, the initial one having acquired the property prior to 1923 from the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Forbes v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. GreeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Parsons v. WeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Seeley v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Domarad v. Fisher & Burke, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Ansley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API