Garner v. Garner

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Felig, J.), dated June 10, 1988, which, inter alia, (1) granted the defendant husband’s motion for a protective order, and (2) denied her cross motion *834to (a) compel the husband to respond to written interrogatories, (b) strike the husband’s answer and counterclaim, (c) direct the husband to pay her additional pendente lite counsel fees, (d) direct the husband to pay her $25,000 in pendente lite litigation expenses, (e) modify her pendente lite…