Legal Opinion

McClearen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

The summons issued from the circuit court of Davidson county cited the defendants to appear and answer plaintiff in an action of damages. The sheriff’s return showed that Taylor Denton was not found in Davidson county. No counterpart was issued. Service of process against the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company was accepted by the commissioner of insurance. The last-named defendant pleaded in abatement (1) that under the Code of 1932 the commissioner of insurance was without authority to accept service of process against foreign insurance companies and his acceptance was insufficient to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haynes v. WoodsTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Cartmell v. Mechanics' Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Clifton v. American Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burns v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
  2. Pack v. RossCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  3. Carroll v. MatthewsTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Brown v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  5. White v. GarnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API