Legal Opinion

MacOn v. Zeiler

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 11, 1963No. [No. 105, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

The buyers of a house and lot brought suit for recovery of the deposit they had made, on the claim of a breach of contract by the sellers. The sellers counterclaimed, alleging that it was the buyers who had breached the contract and so caused them great damage in excess of the amount of the deposit. Judge Berry, sitting without a jury, found that the buyers had not been legally justified in refusing to settle for the property they had agreed to purchase, and had forfeited their deposit. With regard to the counterclaim, he held that the proper measure of damage in a suit by a seller for a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Quillen v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  2. Alois v. WaldmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Traylor v. GraftonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Gonsalves v. BingelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Hubler Rentals, Inc. v. Roadway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  4. Siler v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Hubler Rentals, Inc. v. Roadway Express, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API