Rodriguez v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEORGE C. HANKS, JR. Justice.
A jury found appellant, Roberto Rodriguez, guilty of two felony offenses— driving while intoxicated (DWI) and endangering a child — and found true an enhancement paragraph that a deadly weapon, a motor vehicle, was used in the commission of the offenses. The jury assessed punishment at confinement in prison for four years for the DWI and confinement in state jail for two years for the endangering a child. In four points of error, appellant argues that (1) the evidence is legally insufficient to support the jury’s verdict of guilt for endangering a child…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Mann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Mann v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Trejos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- Mayberry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
- Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Frank Jose Trejos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- Gail Mayberry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.