Legal Opinion

Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Chase

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 26, 2013No. 1D12-2132PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This appeal arises from a final judgment that determined waivers of uninsured/un-derinsured motorist (UM) coverage and UM stacked coverage as well as an owned-but-not-insured vehicle exclusion that were agreed to by the original policyholder, Richard Chase (R. Chase), were not binding when the policyholder became Allison Chase (A.Chase). The appellant, Horace Mann Insurance, argues that the waivers and exclusion were binding on R. Chase’s estate as well as A. Chase, both individually and as personal representative of R. Chase’s estate. We agree in part.

In 2001, R. Chase purchased the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barnier v. RaineyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Travelers Commercial Insurance v. HarringtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allison Chase, etc. v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 2015
  2. Allison Chase, etc. v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API