State v. . Hicks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
INDictmeNt, April Term, 1917, of Okange, Kerr, J. Tbe jury rendered tlie following special verdict: “That tbe defendant and M. J. Jeffreys, in December, 1916, purchased from one Michael, in Orange County, 2% gallons of wine each, in sealed jugs, containing 2% gallons; that said purchase and delivery took place on the premises of the said Michael, in Orange County, and the wine had been manufactured by Michael during the past twelve months, from grapes grown on his own…
Read the full summary
INDictmeNt, April Term, 1917, of Okange, Kerr, J. Tbe jury rendered tlie following special verdict: “That tbe defendant and M. J. Jeffreys, in December, 1916, purchased from one Michael, in Orange County, 2% gallons of wine each, in sealed jugs, containing 2% gallons; that said purchase and delivery took place on the premises of the said Michael, in Orange County, and the wine had been manufactured by Michael during the past twelve months, from grapes grown on his own premises in said county; that the defendant was on his way to his home, with the said wine in his possession, when he was…
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Chapter 35, Public Laws 1911, entitled “An Act to prohibit the sale of near-beer, beerine, and other like drinks,” provides in section 1 that it shall be unlawful to sell or dispose of, for gain, “near-beer, beerine, or other spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors,” etc.; and section 3 makes the following exception: “Provided, further, that this act shall not apply to the sale of domestic wines when sold in quantity of not less than 2% gallons, in sealed packages or crated, on the premises where manufactured, or to the sale of cider in any quantity by the manufacturer from fruits grown on his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. . HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- State v. . GoochSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886