Legal Opinion

Virgil M. Ronzzo v. Maurice Sigler, Warden of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1965No. 17911_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The basic issue presented in this petition for a writ of habeas corpus by a Nebraska state prisoner was succinctly stated in the District Court by Judge Van Pelt to be: “ * * * whether the denial of counsel at a probable cause hearing is a denial of procedural due process where a defendant is not required to plead or take any other steps which might affirmatively prejudice his rights.” Ronzzo v. Sigler, D.C.Neb., 1964, 235 F.Supp. 839, 840. The application for writ was denied, the District Court holding that the defendant, in a state proceeding, was not prejudiced by being deprived of counsel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. White v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Ronzzo v. SiglerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1964

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dale Leroy Konvalin v. Maurice H. Sigler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  2. State v. OlsenMontana Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. SheldonNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Madison v. TahashDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1966
  5. Jerry Sheldon v. State of NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API