Legal Opinion

Borough of Newtown v. Murfit

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County

Decided April 9, 1951PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Biester, J.,

— This matter comes before the court on defendants’ affidavit of defense in the nature of a statutory demurrer.

Defendants assigned five reasons why the demurrer should be sustained, the first of which denies the legal sufficiency of service by registered mail of the notice to curb and pave the sidewalk and gutter in question.

Defendants do not contend that notice was not received by registered mail, but argue that although received, such notice was not in compliance with section 7 of the Municipal Claims Act of May 16, 1923, P. L. 207, 53 PS §2027. This section of the act provides…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Kingston BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  2. Black v. RoebuckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Philadelphia ex rel. DePaul & Son v. Magnolia Cemetery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API