Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 8, 1969No. 41727PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BELCHER, Judge.

The offense is passing as true a forged instrument with two prior convictions for non-capital felonies alleged for enhancement; the punishment, life.

The appellant contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to quash the indictment on the ground that it does not allege and the instrument set out therein does not show that he did any act which purported to be the act of another.

The indictment charges that Lorenzo Smith passed as true to Alfred J. Caviel a forged instrument. The alleged forged instrument set out in the indictment is a Travelers Express…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Carnahan, Alias v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rubeck v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Cuba v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
  3. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Edwards v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  5. Salazar v. Tower, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API