State v. Mezquia
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1Jesus Mezquia was convicted of first degree felony murder in connection with the rape and strangulation death of Mia Zapata. Because we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding "other suspect” evidence regarding Zapata’s former boyfriend or in admitting DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) evidence obtained in Florida and because the trial court’s preliminary ruling regarding ER 404(b) evidence has not been properly preserved for review, we affirm Mezquia’s conviction. The trial court’s imposition of an exceptional sentence, *121however, violated Mezquia’s Sixth Amendment…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. SchiermanWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. SchiermanWashington Supreme Court · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.