Legal Opinion
Jalen Bradley, et al. v. City of Columbus, et al.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 10, 2026No. 2:24-cv-03118Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JALEN BRADLEY, et al., : : Case No. 2:24-cv-03118 Plaintiffs, : : Judge Michael H. Watson v. : : Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson CITY OF COLUMBUS, et al., : : Defendants. : OPINION & ORDER Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ two Motions to Compel (Docs. 246, 251) and Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Take Depositions After the Close of Discovery (Doc. 280). For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motions are DENIED, and Defendants’ Motion (Doc. 280) is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND The Court has summarized the allegations…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mcpherson v. KelseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Sharon Surles, by Next Friend Jayneice Johnson, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Lamar Wright v. City of EuclidCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.