Legal Opinion

Barham v. Beckum

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided July 11, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00058Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION THOMAS BRETT BARHAM PLAINTIFF V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:25-CV-58-KHJ-BWR JASMINE RENEE BECKUM, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court are three [33, 34, 35] Reports and Recommendations (collectively, “the Reports”) of United States Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath. Written objections to the Reports were due by June 23, 2025. The Reports notified the parties that failure to file written objections by that date would bar further appeal in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). For the reasons below, the Court adopts…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. United States of America and Robert W. Wallace v. Claude R. Wilson, Jr., and Modes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  5. Bobby Battle v. U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API