Legal Opinion
Nailen v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided July 18, 1988No. Civ. A. H88-0024(R)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAN M. RUSSELL, Jr., District Judge.
This cause is before this Court on Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the defendant Ford Motor Company, Inc. (Ford), and the Court having examined said motion, together with briefs and exhibits submitted in support and response thereto, finds that for the reasons more fully set forth herein the defendant’s motion is well taken and should be granted.
I. FACTS
On January 6, 1988, William Edgar Nail-en, III (plaintiff), alleging himself to be the personal representative of the Estate of Nancy Caroline Horn Brock, filed his complaint against…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. ChallonerSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Mitchell v. CraftMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Northstar Anesthesia of Alabama, LLC v. NobleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
- Nailen v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Nailen, III v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989