Garland v. State of Georgia
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentGardner, Presiding Judge
The power to punish for contempt is of very ancient origin. The courts have long exercised this power even as early as the annals of the courts. A trial judge’s opinion of any conduct and language addressed to the judge presiding in the case is final unless abused. It is within the power of the trial judge to determine whether the language used and the attorney’s conduct constitute, a contempt of the court and an impediment of the administration of the law in the particular case before him. In this the trial court has a broad discretion and his order cannot be reversed unless that discretion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Fisher v. PaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Bradley v. State ex rel. Solicitor-GeneralSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- In re FiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Cabot v. YarboroughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.