Legal Opinion
AXA Equitable Life Insurance v. Epstein
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 25, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jane S. Solomon, J.
This is a postjudgment motion to compel compliance with an information subpoena under CPLR 5224 (a) (3) (iv) and for contempt for the failure to respond to a subpoena duces tecum under CPLR 5224 (a) (2).
On January 22, 2010 judgment was entered in favor of plaintiffs and against defendant Gabriel Epstein in an amount exceeding $1.3 million. On March 25, 2010 plaintiff AXA Equitable Life Insurance served Epstein with an information subpoena and a subpoena duces tecum (Kaeding affirmation, exhibits E, F). Epstein did not comply with either subpoena and AXA…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coutts Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. v. AnatianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Estate of DevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Roajas v. RecantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by2 opinions
- Building Service 32BJ Pension Fund v. Walber 419 Company LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Slusher v. Asset Consulting Experts, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021