Bagley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
—Appellant was convicted of aggravated ' assault and battery. The record is before us without bills of exception. The motion for new trial sets up the court erred in permitting the State to prove acts and declarations of other persons than the defendant as shown by defendant’s bill of exceptions, but the record does not contain such bill of exceptions.
It is contended that the indictment does not charge an offense against' the laws of the State, and is not in plain and intelligible words. We do not think there is any merit in this. The indictment charges appellant…
2Cited by6 opinions
- State v. McKeehanIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
- El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Fonseca MedinaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1943
- McKinley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Hale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Hale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.