Commonwealth v. Goodwin
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
NIGRO, Justice.
In this appeal, Appellant Constance Goodwin argues that she was subjected to an investigatory stop without the requisite reasonable suspicion that she was engaged in criminal activity. We agree and therefore reverse the Superior Court’s decision affirming the suppression court’s denial of Goodwin’s motion to suppress.1
On November 8, 1993, Pennsylvania State Police Trooper Anthony DeLuca received an anonymous telephone call at 11:15 a.m. The anonymous caller alleged that David Klink’s girlfriend sold drugs to Klink’s minor son, Ian,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Commonwealth v. MelendezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. BoozeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. FellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- State of Maine v. Timothy BarcliftSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.