Commonwealth ex rel. Morgan v. Heilman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan. 16. To a hah. corp. the respondents returned they held the relator under a bail-piece; that they had entered bail to the sheriff, and executed a bail-bond in an action on the case against Morgan, and the plaintiff filed exceptions; that respondents never justified, nor wms any additional bail entered, the amount having been.reduced by the court, on a rule to show cause of action, and why defendant should not be discharged on common bail; that the sheriff afterwards…
Read the full summary
Jan. 16. To a hah. corp. the respondents returned they held the relator under a bail-piece; that they had entered bail to the sheriff, and executed a bail-bond in an action on the case against Morgan, and the plaintiff filed exceptions; that respondents never justified, nor wms any additional bail entered, the amount having been.reduced by the court, on a rule to show cause of action, and why defendant should not be discharged on common bail; that the sheriff afterwards returned the writ “ C. C. and B. B., and respondents bail.” That a declaration was subsequently filed, &c., and verdict and…
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
The exceptions are waived by proceeding, but it is not a discharge of the bail.
The prisoner was remanded.