Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State Ex Rel. Ayer v. Ewing

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1952No. 28,878Published

1Concurrence

CONCURRING OPINION

Emmert, J.

In considering the Impeachment Act of 1897 (hereafter referred to as the Act), §49-836, Burns’ 1951 Replacement, Ch. 182, Acts 1897, it should be first observed that it is anything but perfect legislation, and was apparently adopted from some other jurisdiction without any consideration being given the constitutional limitations contained in our 1851 Con*15stitution. The provisions for removal by grand jury accusation, contained in §§21 to 88, inclusive, of the Act, §§48-821 to 48-833, Burns’ 1951 Replacement, provide no statutory causes for removal, although in State…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Brindley v. MearaIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Sherfey v. City of BrazilIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State ex rel. Workman v. GoldthaitIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. BarrettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State Ex Rel. Ayer v. EwingIndiana Supreme Court · 1952

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API