Legal Opinion

Fugate v. Glasscock

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 15, 1842PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the Audrian Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of t]ie Court, delivered by

Scott, Judge. *

Glasscock brought an action of assumpsit against Fugate, and afterwards, m aid of his suit, sued out an attachment. The fact set forth in the affidavit on which the attachment issued was, that the plaintiff had good reason to believe, and did believe, that the defendant was about to dispose of his property, so as to hinder his creditors in the collection of their debts.

Fugate, by plea, denied that he was about to dispose of his property so as to hinder his creditors in the collection of *578^e^s‘ ^'s P^ea *ssue was í°in«d. an£la jury sworn try it.…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coombs Commission Co. v. BlockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Hulett v. NugentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  3. Bourgoin v. WheatonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  4. Houghland v. DentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API