Legal Opinion

Mower Harwood Creamery & Dairy Supply Co. v. Hill

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 21, 1907PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Taylor District Court.— Hon. H. M. Towner, Judge. Action on a contract resulted in judgment as prayed. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

Some time in 1905, plaintiff undertook to erect and equip a creamery at Lenox, Iowa, in consideration of $4,700 to be paid by forty-seven subscribers in sums of $100 each. It did so, and in this action seeks to enforce payment from defendant, whose name was the twenty-ninth on the list. The defense interposed was that his signature *601was secured by fraud, in that, as is alleged, plaintiff’s agent represented to him that he was procuring names of those who would take stock in a co-operative creamery, and that by signing his name to the paper he incurred no liability whatever unless he…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grierson v. . MasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Wallace v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  3. McKinney v. HerrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  4. Reid, Murdock & Co. v. BradleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McNinch v. Northwest Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Watt v. German Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1917
  3. Midland Mortgage Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Shores-Mueller Co. v. LonningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Bass Furn. & Carpet Co. v. FinleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API