Martinez-Mendoza v. State (In re C.M.)
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DARBY, J.:
*765¶ 1 The questions presented to this Court are whether 1) the Oklahoma Department of Human Services (DHS) provided reasonable efforts to reunite Mother with Children; 2) the State presented clear and convincing evidence to support the termination of parental rights; and 3) Mother's trial counsel provided effective assistance. We answer all questions in the affirmative.
I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 On August 27, 2013, DHS removed R.M., C.M., and E.M., then eight (8) years and six (6) months, six (6) years and ten (10) months, and four (4) years and ten (10) months old…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Glasco v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- ODOM v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Matter of Christopher H.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Michael F. v. State ex rel. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- IN THE MATTER OF K. H.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- HARRISON v. OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEMSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- HARRISON v. OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEMSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- IN THE MATTER OF K. H.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- IN THE MATTER OF: A.A.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.