Legal Opinion
Ehrman v. Cook Electric Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 22, 1979No. 77 C 635PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROBSON, Senior District Judge.
This cause is before the court on defendants’ Cook Electric Company’s and Northern Telecom Limited’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons hereinafter stated, the motion is denied.
The plaintiff Fred Ehrman brings this action against the defendants Cook Electric Company [hereinafter Cook] and Northern Telecom Limited [hereinafter Northern] to recover a finder’s fee allegedly owed to him under an oral contract between himself and the defendants. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and is undisputed.
Defendants move for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Cook Associates, Inc. v. Colonial Broach & MacHine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Havenfield Corporation v. H & R Block, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- P. S. & E. Inc., D/B/A Packing Seals & Engineering Co. v. Selastomer Detroit, Inc., a Division of Microdot, Inc., and Microdot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Alan M. Gold and Alan M. Gold Development Company v. Alan B. WolpertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Jacobs/kahan & Company v. Richard M. Marsh and Frances M. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- McIntosh v. Magna Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- Pako Corp. v. CitytrustDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.