Stelter v. Department of Labor & Industries
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentChambers, J.
(dissenting) — I respectfully dissent. My learned colleagues have determined facts appropriate for a trial court. I agree with the majority that “[t]he critical question here is whether Drotzmann, Inc., engaged exclusively in interstate activities.” Majority at 710. If Drotzmann, Inc., employed Robert Stelter to make any intrastate deliveries, Drotzmann, Inc., was not engaged exclusively in interstate commerce. Material questions of fact remain unanswered. Therefore, I would affirm the Court of Appeals and remand for further proceedings.
*712This court applies common law principles of agency…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Southcenter Joint Venture v. National Democratic Policy CommitteeWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital v. Franklin CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Novenson v. Spokane Culvert & Fabricating Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Davis v. Early Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.