Legal Opinion

De Lisle v. Herbs

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881Published

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the trial of this action by the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Boardman, J.:

This is an action in equity brought to set aside a conveyance by the plaintiff while she was an infant feme-covert, and for the assignment of her dower in the premises thus conveyed.

The plaintiff’s then husband in 1848 purchased the premises in which dower is now claimed for $6,000, of which $1,000 was paid in cash, $1,000 in promissory notes, and $4,000 in a purchase-money mortgage executed by her then husband only.

In January, 1849, the plaintiff and her husband united in the conveyance of said premises subject to said $4,000 mortgage to John Tan Dusen, Sr. The plaintiff was at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barnes v. . MottNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Rogers v. RogersNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
  3. Champney v. . CoopeNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  4. Gardner v. AstorNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  5. Nicholson v. HalseyNew York Court of Chancery · 1815

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API