Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Hicks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 16, 1941No. 6 Div. 781PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

This is a proceeding to determine the right of the custody and control of Lorraine Hicks, the five year old daughter of the parties to this cause.

In May, 1939, the parties to this litigation, who were then husband and wife, made and entered into the following agreement: .

“State of Alabama
“Jefferson County
“This agreement made and entered into on this the - day of May, 1939, by and between Madge Hardy Hicks, hereinafter referred to as the party of the first part, and William H. Hicks, hereinafter referred to as the party of the second part:
“Witnesseth:
“Whereas, the parties…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. AnonymousSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. Hawkins v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Butler v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DevineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Greene v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Hammac v. HammacSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Meadows v. HulseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API