Legal Opinion

Grancio v. De Vecchio

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 27, 2009No. 1:06-mj-00069PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BLOCK, Senior District Judge.

On July 24, 2008, the Court entered a Memorandum and Order (“the July 24th M & 0”) dismissing the claims brought by Maria Grancio (“Mrs.Grancio”), on behalf of herself and the estate of her late husband, against R. Lindley DeVecchio, Christopher Favo and the United States. See Grancio v. DeVecchio, 572 F.Supp.2d 299 (E.D.N.Y.2008). The Court held that Mrs. Grancio had “failed to adduce sufficient admissible evidence to support her claim that DeVecchio and Favo played a part in her husband’s murder.” Id. at 314. Familiarity with the July 24th M…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Piper v. City of ElmiraDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API