Legal Opinion
Insoft v. Steadfast Insurance Company
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided March 17, 2025No. 8:24-cv-01817Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION MELISSA INSOFT and PARKER INSOFT, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 8:24-cv-1817-WFJ-SPF STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. _____________________________________/ ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Steadfast Insurance Company’s (“Steadfast”) motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 39) and Plaintiffs Melissa and Parker Insoft’s motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. 40) on the threshold issue of Steadfast’s duty to defend. The parties have filed their respective responses and replies (Dkts. 43, 44, 47, 48), and the Court held a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tipton v. Bergrohr GMBH-SiegenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- American Bankers Insurance Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Swire Pacific Holdings, Inc. v. Zurich Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.