Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rondino v. Feld

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 2, 1937Published

1Dissent

Lydon, J. (dissenting).

I dissent and vote to reverse the order of the official referee.

The determination about to be made by the majority of the court rests upon the proposition that the consent of the attorneys for defendants to the entry of an order granting plaintiff’s motion for a preference was a waiver of defendants’ right to appeal from the order granting a new trial. The short answer to this contention is that the attorneys are not shown to have possessed any authority to waive so substantial a right belonging to their clients.

But even if the consent had been authorized by defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Herpe v. . HerpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Alsens American Portland Cement Works v. Degnon Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Clark v. KirbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Citizens National Bank v. CaldwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API