Christian Dior, Inc. v. Schaffner & Marx
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman
Defendant Hart Schaffner & Marx (HSM) appeals the trial court’s confirmation of the unanimous arbitration award in favor of plaintiff, Christian Dior, Inc. (Dior), totalling $1,215,000. On appeal, HSM asserts that the arbitrators exceeded their authority beyond the terms of the arbitration agreement and the Uniform Arbitration Act (710 ILCS 5/1 et seq. (West 1992)) (Arbitration Act), and committed gross mistakes of law and fact.
We affirm.
HSM and Dior entered a licensing agreement wherein Dior granted HSM the exclusive license in the United States to manufacture men’s clothing bearing the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burchell v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Rauh v. Rockford Products Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Edward Electric Co. v. Automation, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Johnson v. BaumgardtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Ure v. Wangler Const. Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Salsitz v. KreissIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Perkins Restaurants Operating Co. v. Van Den Bergh Foods Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Salsitz v. Kreiss Modification of September 20, 2001, Opinion Upon Denial of RehearingIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Trimble v. GravesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Trimble v. GravesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011