Legal Opinion

Christian Dior, Inc. v. Schaffner & Marx

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 22, 1994No. 1-93-1159PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman

Defendant Hart Schaffner & Marx (HSM) appeals the trial court’s confirmation of the unanimous arbitration award in favor of plaintiff, Christian Dior, Inc. (Dior), totalling $1,215,000. On appeal, HSM asserts that the arbitrators exceeded their authority beyond the terms of the arbitration agreement and the Uniform Arbitration Act (710 ILCS 5/1 et seq. (West 1992)) (Arbitration Act), and committed gross mistakes of law and fact.

We affirm.

HSM and Dior entered a licensing agreement wherein Dior granted HSM the exclusive license in the United States to manufacture men’s clothing bearing the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burchell v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Rauh v. Rockford Products Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Edward Electric Co. v. Automation, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Johnson v. BaumgardtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Ure v. Wangler Const. Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Salsitz v. KreissIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Perkins Restaurants Operating Co. v. Van Den Bergh Foods Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. Salsitz v. Kreiss Modification of September 20, 2001, Opinion Upon Denial of RehearingIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Trimble v. GravesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. Trimble v. GravesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API