Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 17, 1992No. CR 91-219PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant, Vaugn Young, filed his abstract and brief in this case. The State filed the appellee’s brief. Prior to the time his reply brief was due, the appellant’s attorney realized that his abstract was insufficient and filed a motion asking that he be allowed to supplement his abstract and brief. Since the case is not yet ready for submission, we grant the motion and allow the appellant fifteen days within which to file a substituted abstract and brief.

Rule 9(e)(2) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals provides that, when it does not cause an unreasonable or unjust…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moncrief v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Trapp v. Economy Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API