In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, P. J.
The facts are adequately set forth in the opinion of Mr. Justice Dore. We agree that there is solely a question of law presented on this appeal and that the issue is a narrow one. *544We cannot agree, however, with the conclusion that the insurance company is not in possession of property transmitted at death.
The obligations of the insurance company were:
1. To pay to the assured the cash surrender value;
2. To pay to the executor or administrator of the decedent the face amount of the policy and accumulations in the event that the decedent so designated;
3. In the event that the decedent failed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Crossman Co. v. RauchNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
3Cited by24 opinions
- Security First National Bank of Los Angeles v. WellslagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- In re the Estate of RyleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- In Re the Accounting of TuttleNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- In re the Accounting of BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.