Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Azar

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 5, 2018No. Civil Action No. 15–13530–NMGPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

An item not included within the list may still qualify as durable medical equipment if it satisfies the following regulatory definition:

Durable medical equipment means equipment, furnished by a supplier or a home health agency that meets the following conditions:(1) Can withstand repeated use.(2) Effective with respect to items classified as DME after January 1, 2012, has an expected life of at least 3 years.(3) Is primarily and customarily used to serve a medical purpose.(4) Generally is not useful to an individual in the absence of an illness or injury.(5) Is appropriate for use in the home.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seavey v. Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. In Re Extradition of Curtis Andrew Howard. United States of America v. Curtis Andrew HowardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. Walker-Butler v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  4. Finigan v. BurwellDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  5. Tangney v. BurwellDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Olsen v. BecerraDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2021
  2. Zieroth v. AzarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  3. Zieroth v. AzarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API