Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Moody v. Morris-Roberts Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1923Published
1Concurrence
MCCARTHY, C. J.,
Specially Concurring. — I concur in the result in this case but on other grounds than those set forth in the opinion. C. S., sec. 5905, provides that a qualified indorsement constitutes the indorser a mere assignor of the title to the instrument. The indorsement upon which the suit is brought is a qualified indorsement. C. S., see. 5932, provides:
“Every person negotiating an instrument by delivery or by a qualified indorsement, warrants:
“1. That the instrument is genuino and in all respects what it purports to be.
*426“2. That he has a good title to it.
“3. That all prior parties…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilson v. Sunnyside Orchard Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Smith v. BarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- International Harvester Co. of America v. BeverlandIdaho Supreme Court · 1923