Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Moody v. Morris-Roberts Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1923Published

1Concurrence

MCCARTHY, C. J.,

Specially Concurring. — I concur in the result in this case but on other grounds than those set forth in the opinion. C. S., sec. 5905, provides that a qualified indorsement constitutes the indorser a mere assignor of the title to the instrument. The indorsement upon which the suit is brought is a qualified indorsement. C. S., see. 5932, provides:

“Every person negotiating an instrument by delivery or by a qualified indorsement, warrants:
“1. That the instrument is genuino and in all respects what it purports to be.
*426“2. That he has a good title to it.
“3. That all prior parties…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Sunnyside Orchard Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Smith v. BarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. BeverlandIdaho Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API