Legal Opinion

Tajuanda Berry v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 2015No. 49A02-1403-CR-140PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PYLE, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Tajuanda Berry (“Berry”) appeals her sentence, after a bench trial, for Class A misdemeanor trespass. 1 On appeal, she claims that the trial court erred by ordering her to stay away from all properties managed by the Indianapolis Housing Agency (“IHA”). She asks that this Court vacate the order because the order is overly broad and not related to any rehabilitative goal or maintenance of public safety. Concluding that the trial court’s statement was not part of its imposed sentence, we affirm Berry’s sentence.

We affirm.

ISSUE

We restate the issue in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. McElroy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Murrell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Wayne Hurd v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commitment of P PIndiana Court of Appeals · 2026
  2. Daniel E. Baker v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. David G. Taylor v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Joshua T. Prince v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Timothy Patton v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API