Legal Opinion

Ikemire v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 18, 2006No. 42A01-0510-CR-473PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAY, Judge.

Ronnie Ikemire appeals his conviction after a jury trial of dealing in a controlled substance, a Class B felony. The evidence was sufficient to support Ikemire's conviection. Ikemire's trial was held more than 70 days after he was arrested, but he was not entitled to discharge under Criminal Rule 4(B) because he was at least partially at fault for its continuance. He was not entitled to a "mere presence" instruction as the evidence presented at trial did not support such an instruction, and the hearsay objection made by the State was properly sustained. We affirm the trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Haviland v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Lampitok v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Forte v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Bradley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. TabaldiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  2. Robert Carr III v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Christopher Riddle v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API