Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. . Reynolds.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1935PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStagy, C. J.

May a husband ground an action for divorce, under C. S. 1659 (a), on his own criminal conduct towards his wife? The answer is, No. Teasley v. Teasley, 205 N. C., 604, 172 S. E., 191. Any other holding would be a reproach to the law. Bean v. Detective Co., 206 N. C., 125, 173 S. E., 5. The decisions in Campbell v. Campbell, 207 N. C., 859, and Long v. Long, 206 N. C., 706, 175 S. E., 85, are not authorities to the contrary, for in neither of these cases was there a plea in bar based upon plaintiff's alleged criminal conduct towards the defendant.

“It is very generally held — universally, so far…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. Bean v. Home Detective Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Long v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Long v. LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Campbell v. . CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Byers v. . ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Byers v. ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Brown v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API