Legal Opinion
Cal-Almond, Inc. v. Department of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 10, 1995No. Nos. 94-17160, 94-17163, 94-17164, 94-17166, 94-17167 and 94-17182PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:
In a previous appeal for these cases, we held that certain provisions of the California Almond Marketing Order (Order), 7 C.F.R. § 981, violated the free speech and free association rights of several almond handlers. Cal-Almond, Inc. v. Department of Agriculture, 14 F.3d 429 (9th Cir.1993) (Cal-Almond I). We remanded the case to the district court to conduct the fact-intensive inquiry necessary to determine the appropriate remedy. On remand, the district court ordered the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to refund the full amount the almond handlers had…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Cal-Almond Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Friends of Wild Swan, Inc. v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1995
- Country Eggs, Inc. v. KawamuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.