Legal Opinion

Gee v. Bullock, 96-2223 (1996)

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 16, 1996No. C.A. No. 96-2223Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

The plaintiffs, Randall Gee and Beverly Van Slyke, brought this action for injunctive relief to prohibit the defendant, Kathleen Bullock, from operating a limited liability company without their direct involvement and to reestablish joint operation of that company. By agreement of the parties, the nonjury trial of the action on the merits was consolidated with the hearing on the plaintiffs' application for an injunction.

Facts and Travel

In 1994, the defendant and her then partner, David Thow, operated a limited liability corporation known as "Thow Pasta" (Thow) located at 259 County…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Durapin, Inc. v. American Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  2. Landmark Medical Center v. GauthierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  3. National Credit Union Administration Board v. RegineDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1992
  4. McGovern v. CrossleySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  5. Grassi v. GombergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API