Legal Opinion

Quigley v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 7, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On demurrer to declaration.

1Opinion of the Court

Tlie opinion of the court was delivered by

Gummere, Chief Justice.

The defendant demurs to the third count of the plaintiff’s declaration. Tlie count is framed for the purpose of bringing the case within the provisions of the act of April 13th, 1909 (Pamph. L., p. 114), entitled “An act to extend and regulate the liability of employers for injury or death to employes in certain cases.” The averments of the count are in substance as follows: That the defendant was on and prior to November 1st, 1909, in-control of a certain lino of railroad with its appurtenances over which it was engaged in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Warner v. HoaglandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888
  2. State v. HancockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  3. Common Council of Beverly v. WalnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sexton ex rel. Kin v. Newark District Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  2. Clark v. ByrneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. In Re Prudential Insurance Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  4. Beagle v. Lehigh & Wilkes-barre Coal Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  5. Pappagello v. HydeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API