Legal Opinion

Devlin v. Devlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 28, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court, after a lengthy trial, determined that it would be in the best interests of the parties’ son to award custody to plaintiff. Where, as here, there has been a trial, the determination of the trial court, which was in a position to evaluate the testimony, character and sincerity of the witnesses, must be accorded great weight (see, Matter of Louise E. S. v W. Stephen S., 64 NY2d 946; Matter of Forjone v Platner, 191 AD2d 1033; Gugino-Toufexis v Toufexis, 132 AD2d 995). The record shows that the trial court carefully weighed and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Friederwitzer v. FriederwitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Louise E. S. v. W. Stephen S.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Gugino-Toufexis v. ToufexisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Forjone v. PlatnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Paul C. v. Tracy C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Fisher v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API