Legal Opinion
Micali v. Union Free Valley Stream School District 24
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the petitioner Paul Micali appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated February 5, 2002, as denied the petition insofar as asserted by him.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
When deciding whether to grant a petition for leave to serve a late notice of claim, a court must consider whether the petitioner demonstrated a reasonable excuse for his or her failure to serve a timely notice…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Deegan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Kittredge v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Guiliano v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Gilliam v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Landa v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Doe v. Goshen Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Igneri v. New York City Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003