Legal Opinion

American Humanist Association v. Maryland-National Capital Park

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 1, 2018No. 15-2597PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On a requested poll of the court on appellees' petitions for rehearing en banc, a majority of active judges voted to deny rehearing en banc. Judge Motz, Judge Duncan, Judge Keenan, Judge Wynn, Judge Diaz, Judge Floyd, Judge Thacker, and Judge Harris voted to deny rehearing en banc. Chief Judge Gregory, Judge Wilkinson, Judge Niemeyer, Judge Traxler, Judge King, and Judge Agee voted to grant rehearing en banc.

The petitions for rehearing en banc are denied.

Judge Wynn filed a concurring opinion, and Chief Judge Gregory, Judge Wilkinson, and Judge Niemeyer filed dissenting opinions.

Entered at the…

Also in this document: Dissent · Wilkinson; Dissent · Niemeyer.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Everson v. Board of Ed. of EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Abington School Dist. v. SchemppSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Legion v. American Humanist Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Yin v. Columbia Int'l Univ.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2018
  3. Freedom from Religion Found., Inc. v. Chino Valley Unified Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Freedom From Religion v. Chino Valley Uni. Sch. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API