Legal Opinion

EXXON CORPORATION v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 8, 1974No. Civ. 1047, 1093PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

STEWART, District Judge:

Plaintiffs have moved for a summary judgment on the ground that the Federal Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives, 38 Fed.Reg. 33734 (Dec. 6, 1973) (hereinafter Dec. 6, 1973 Regulations) has preempted Sections 1403.2-13.11 and 1403.2-13.12 of the Administrative Code of the City, which prescribe the maximum lead content and volatility limits of regular and premium grade gasoline sold in New York City. The Dec. 6, 1973 Regulations, promulgated by the Administrator for the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA) (hereinafter Federal Administrator)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Sierra Club v. RuckelshausDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1972
  3. Fri v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Chrysler Corp. v. TofanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  5. Exxon Corporation v. The City of New York, Getty Oil Co. (Eastern Operations), Inc. v. The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Highland Park v. TrainCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  2. Exxon Corporation v. The City of New York, Getty Oil Co. (Eastern Operations), Inc. v. The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. The City of Highland Park, Illinois, Etc. v. Russell E. Train, Etc., the City of Highland Park, Illinois, Etc. v. Russell E. Train, as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API